{"api":{"host":"https:\/\/pinot.decanter.com","authorization":"Bearer MDhiNDEwMGE0ZWY5MDY0MDVkZTQyYTkxN2IyOGVlMGUzM2MyNTcyNDc5MjhjMThiMzlhODRiNThiODllMmJiZg","version":"2.0"},"piano":{"sandbox":"false","aid":"6qv8OniKQO","rid":"RJXC8OC","offerId":"OFPHMJWYB8UK","offerTemplateId":"OFPHMJWYB8UK","wcTemplateId":"OTOW5EUWVZ4B"}}

PREMIUM

Breaking down barriers: The case for rosé as a fine wine

Can rosé make the leap from swimming pool staple to wine cellar stablemate? Chris Losh ponders the question after a presentation of older rosés at a recent tasting.

Rosé has been the still wine success story of the last 15 years.

From being a drink that barely dared speak its name around the millennium it’s now become a staple of Friday night sofas, garden barbecues and sun-baked terraces the world over.

There are even signs that wine drinkers are beginning to accept that it’s not solely for summer.

Yet for all its progress one door remains stubbornly shut. Pinks can be good, they can be ambitious, they can be expensive.

But this is still a style that is not really considered a ‘fine wine’.

The fine wine question

The question is: Is this thinking justified? Or do we need to knock down the final barrier to entry, and think about top-end rosés the same way we do about the upper tier of reds and whites?

To begin with, it’s probably helpful to consider what actually constitutes a fine wine.

You might think – as some respected tasters do – that depth, concentration, balance and complexity in the liquid are sufficient.

Others, however, are looking for something beyond what’s simply good in the here and now.


Related articles

Rosé myths: Why most of what you think you know about pink wine is probably wrong

Champagne Laurent-Perrier: Rosé perfectionists

Expert’s Choice: 18 diverse and delicious Portuguese rosés

Latest Wine News